
Electromagnetic
Fields
Electromagnetic
fields (EMFs) have received a lot of attention in the last few
decades. Some folks believe they
cause cancer, especially childhood leukemia. Others argue that
there is no risk.
Controversy and
confusion continue. It seems
like a good time to review the current thinking on the subject.
What are EMFs?
Electromagnetic
fields are actually a combination of electric and magnetic fields. They occur when electrical current flows through
cable or an electrical device. All electrical devices create
an electromagnetic field when in use. The intensity of the
field varies with the voltage. Higher voltage creates stronger
electric fields. The current flow creates the magnetic field. Thus,
primary transmission wires (those cables usually on towers or high
poles) generate more intense EMFs.
The reason some
folks are concerned about EMFs is that the charged particles created
by EMFs have an effect on distant objects. The
best example is to consider how a compass works. The North
Pole attracts the compass’s needle because the electromagnetic
field at the North Pole is greater than at any other location on
earth.
How can I measure them?
EMFs are measured
in milligauss (mG), or one-thousandth of a gauss. A
gauss is a unit of measure of the intensity of an EMF, also known
as magnetic flux density.
It is known that
the intensity of an EMF decreases as you move away from the source. Many electrical appliances, for example, have
relatively strong EMFs when you are within a few inches of the device,
whereas virtually all EMFs created by electrical devices measure
below 2 mG when you are three feet or more away. Electrical
devices that use motors (can openers, saws, hair dryers, etc.) may
have an EMF intensity of 1,000 mG or more within a few inches. That
will drop to 100 mG or less one foot away and 10 mG or less three
feet away.
For high-voltage power lines (transmission lines), the EMF often
measures below 2 mG at 50 to 100 feet from the power line and virtually
always drops below 2 mG by the time you are 300 feet from the power
line.
What is safe?
What level of
EMF is safe? To date, there is no known safe
OR UNSAFE level. There are those who have suggested that levels
less than 2 milligauss (mG) are “safe.” There is
no credible, scientific basis for such a conclusion, however. Further,
there may not be any level that is UNSAFE.
Are EMFs dangerous?
Other factors
contribute to our risk of cancer. It is virtually
impossible to isolate any one cause. Background EMF readings
range from 1 mG to several mG. PCBs, herbicides, and ozone
have been identified as possible contributory causes. Traffic
density is a significant factor, because traffic exhaust contains
known carcinogens.
It is important
to note that the health effects of EMFs have been, and continue
to be, EXTENSIVELY researched. As part of our
preparation for this article, we found about 474,000 references on
the Internet! Of course, not everything on the Internet is
reliable or accurate, but the sheer number of references is note
worthy.
According to our research, about $20 million is spent annually on
investigations related to the health effects of EMFs.
The credible articles we encountered in our research are peer reviewed,
which creates delays in publication; therefore, the most recent articles
are a few years old. The following are some highlights of our research:
A 1996 review by a prominent group of scientists at the U.S. National
Academy of Science concluded that:
No conclusive and consistent evidence shows that exposures to residential
electric and magnetic fields produce cancer, adverse neurobehavioral
effects, or reproductive and developmental effects.
A 2001 review by the U.K. National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB)
concluded that:
Laboratory experiments have provided no good evidence that extremely
low frequency electromagnetic fields are capable of producing cancer,
nor do human epidemiological studies suggest that they cause cancer
in general.
A review of the epidemiological literature by the International
Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection concludes that:
In the absence of evidence from cellular or animal studies, and
given the methodological uncertainties and in many cases inconsistencies
of the existing epidemiological literature, there is no chronic disease
for which an etiological [causal] relation to [power-frequency fields] can be regarded as established.
In an article written by Dr. John E. Moulder, Professor of Radiation
Oncology, he states:
The
largest studies of childhood leukemia and power lines ever done
reported in 1997–2000 that they could find no significant
evidence for an association of power lines with childhood leukemia. In
contrast, a pair of studies published in 2000 reported that if all
the studies in which magnetic fields could be measured or estimated
were pooled, a statistically significant association could be found
for childhood leukemia in the children with the highest average fields.
On the other hand, a series of studies have shown that life-time
exposure of animals to power-frequency magnetic fields does not cause
cancer.
There is a broad consensus in the scientific community that no causal
association has been established between residential exposure to
EMF and human health hazards.
In 1994, a report from the American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs stated:
No scientifically documented health risk has been associated with
usually occurring levels of electromagnetic fields.
However, it was
recommended that the AMA continue to monitor developments and issues
related to the effects of EMFs.
In June 1999,
after six years of research, the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences concluded that the evidence for the risk of cancer
and other human disease from the electromagnetic fields (EMFs)
around power lines is “weak.”
The bottom line
appears to be that there is no scientifically conclusive relationship
between EMFs and the risk of cancer, including leukemia. However,
there are some studies that have seen some slight evidence of a relationship,
making it impossible to conclude that there is absolutely no hazard
related to EMFs.
In 1991, the
U.S. Congress asked the National Academy of Sciences to review
the literature on the possible health risks of residential exposure
to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields. In
response, the National Research Council, the research arm of the
National Academy of Sciences, set up a committee of epidemiologists,
biologists, chemists, and physicists who were experts in cancer,
reproductive toxicology and neurobiological effects. The committee
issued its report in November of 1996. The following are quotes
from the executive summary:
Based on a comprehensive evaluation of published studies relating
to the effects of power-frequency electric and magnetic fields on
cells, tissues, and organisms (including humans), the conclusion
of the committee is that the current body of evidence does not show
that exposure to these fields presents a human-health hazard.
No conclusive and consistent evidence shows that exposures to residential
electric and magnetic fields produce cancer, adverse neurobehavioral
effects, or reproductive and developmental effects.
As recently as July 2002 (and followed by a similar statement in
January 2003), the Wellness Letter published by the University of
California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, stated:
An exhaustive
study by a panel of leading scientists for the National Research
Council has concluded that there is ‘no
conclusive and consistent evidence that electromagnetic fields
(EMFs) from power lines or household wiring cause cancer, miscarriages,
birth defects, or other health problems.’
So, is there
a risk to humans exposed to EMFs? After reviewing
many credible, well-supported studies, the consensus seems to be
a decisive “probably not.” And yet, for some, the
concern will continue. We do not live in a safe world. Science
cannot eliminate all risks. Cancer, like most other diseases,
can seldom be attributed to a single cause. What is important
for you, as a responsible adult, is to make well-informed decisions
about managing the many risks you face.